Having studied Byzantine history, I cannot help seeing history (where applicable) from the Byzantine perspective. This is tremendously beneficial; in most cases the Byzantine/later roman perspective is more interesting, more illuminating and more mature. At the same time it can be quite frustrating because, relatively speaking, it is a minority position. The majority of historians and history texts tend to be neglectful of the Empire, much to their and our detriment.
This came to mind when reading Shlomo Sand’s The Invention of the Jewish People. A fascinating study of the history of the Jews and how Jewish scholarship became intertwined with Israeli state-building.
It covers all the issues you might expect: Zionism, the Khazar question etc. But it also makes an interesting assertion that reinforces the importance and influence of the Roman/Byzantine empire. Not only are Christianity and Islam inextricably linked with it, but the peculiar nature and extraordinary capacities of the Empire also gave us the Judaism we are now familiar with.
In tracing the movements of the Jewish peoples, Sand shows that, contrary to the idea that admittance to the Jewish faith is and always has been exclusive, during early roman times they were proselytising at a fantastic rate. The infrastructure of the Empire and it’s religious tolerance created an atmosphere in which Judaism could prosper and quickly, as so many sources show, become a huge problem – almost identical to the later proliferation of Christianity.
The Invention of the Jewish People was thus a curious read. One that often displayed the kind of solipsism that frustrates, yet one that also exemplifies the importance of the grand, macroscopic view that emphasizes the importance of Roman/Byzantine history that properly unlocks the past and explains the present.